Fear in symbols and names!

Do you fear symbols and names?

But symbols have no inherent power nor does names do they?


They have power only when people believe in them. In which case it’s the belief that is the power.

Just as important, symbols have no inherent meaning. They only have the meaning given to them by someone or a group.

So, for example, the famous eye and pyramid mean zero. Zilch. They only have meaning because Masons and other groups have assigned it.

The Eye of Horus is an ancient Egyptian symbol of protection, royal power and good health. The eye is personified in the goddess Wadjet (also written as Wedjat, or “Udjat”, Uadjet, Wedjoyet, Edjo or Uto). It is also known as ”The Eye of Ra”.

oooh it must be bad it means the Eye of Ra. Oh me everybody run hide your kids its the eye of Ra the evil King.

People really do this. They have a really hard time with this.

There is no closed secret world of symbols that has magic in it.

There are no universally good symbols or bad symbols. A symbol is a word, term, sign, shape. It’s injected with meaning by a group. The group adopts a consensus about the symbol.

To a surprising degree, people think in terms of symbols. They operate as if they understand what they’re doing, but they don’t. They fear the power of certain symbols and attach themselves to the power of other “good” symbols. They’re hooked.

You could make a picture of a oak tree, and invent a whole mythology around it. You could claim it comes from Atlantis or Heaven, or from a secret city in ancient Babylonian .

And then some people would react when they saw it. They would feel fear or anger or excitement.

But what if your a painter and like to paint trees, does this make the image of a tree bad. No! of coarse not. But if one has a bad experience with the symbol or name he/she might avoid using it and cringe if they see it in the public.

It’s a con.

You don’t really think symbols and names become phobias do you?

If you took this even further and created a whole set of symbols, dozens of them, and made up meanings for them, and worked with this game, you would eventually experience an interesting kind of liberation. You would see, to a greater extent, how arbitrary symbols are, how people trap themselves in “internal symbolic spaces.”

The whole point of frozen symbols is to enclose consciousness.

Let’s say you devised a picture of an eyeball hovering in a forest. A tear is dropping from the eye. The literal mind is looking for specific meaning. The literal mind wants an answer. It can’t find one.

The eyeball and the forest and the tear don’t add up. They provoke all sorts of associations, but no particular meaning, and the literal mind is frustrated.

So THEN you come along and assign a meaning. You say, “Well, this symbol was painted on masks in 834BC by the ancient Egyptian founders of a cult of pyramid builders. The eye and the tear stand for the tragedy caused by lack of faith in eternal life…”

And so forth and so on. It makes me sick.

Now you’ve assigned specific meaning to the symbol. Now the literal mind breathes a sigh of relief. It has an answer. It can suck up that meaning and take it in and accept it. And now you can embellish the story and sell it to the literal mind. You can make that symbol into an object of fear and repulsion, if that’s the reaction you want to provoke in your audience, or you can make the symbol into an object of victory that stands for redemption.

You can twist and turn the symbol any way you want to.

The literal mind wants an answer to the mystery, a solution, and you provided it.

We’re talking about a very primitive form of art. When people operate at this level, buying symbols and their assigned meanings, it’s an indication they can’t appreciate or fathom more complex art.

They can’t read and fathom a novel or watch a stage play. That’s too much. There isn’t a clear one-to-one connecting pipeline between symbol and meaning sitting in a movie theater watching a crime drama. The cops arrested the wrong man and framed him for a killing. A guy sitting next to me blew his top. He started telling his girl friend about how the cops were railroading this suspect and how bad the cops were, , and so they’re confused. They’re frustrated.

I remember a guy I knew who had a big issue with symbols and names. He came over one day and I noticed a new pair of shoes he had on. They were Starter brand shoes and Starter uses a symbol of a star. I said look a star on your shoe, he said “What” ? You could tell he never seen it (it was quite small) but was very agitated about it very agitated.

But why? He later told me that certain names and symbols he has a real problem with. I told him its just what you attach to it and the fear you have accumulated from life experiences. He told me when he learned the star of David was used for a secret group of evil people, then he just attached it to many other names and symbols he already hates.

The literal mind at work.

In the same way, people accept the meanings that are assigned to symbols, and they react to those meanings in a reflex fashion.

In truth, symbols are open. They have no intrinsic meaning. People can inject any meaning they want to.

But when they’re trapped in a layer of symbolic thinking, they can’t see that. They’re determined to accept the already-assigned meaning and react to it.

Which is an invitation to propagandists.

Worse yet, it’s a fixation that artificially defines the limits of mind.

Symbols form a matrix-shell inside which minds live. Until they don’t.

In case you hadn’t noticed, lunatic school officials have been punishing students for symbols of guns. Pop tart chewed into the shape of a gun. Screen saver showing a picture of a gun. T-shirt with a message supporting the 2nd Amendment.

A story about someone burning an American flag receives far more coverage and more reaction than a statement that the federal government violates the Constitution in a hundred ways.

Presidents are symbols. That is, the public reacts to the meanings broadly assigned to their images. The last time I looked, Americans in Kansas and Ohio weren’t sitting in the Oval Office having long conversations with Presidents.

Neither, I dare say, are Americans sitting down and talking with Satan. They’re reacting to meanings assigned to images of Satan painted by others.

Artists are in a unique position. They can make and unmake symbols at will. They can imbue symbols with meaning and then change the meanings or destroy the symbols. They don’t have to live under the dome of consensus symbols and their assigned meanings.

There are people who will argue that some symbols have “inherent meaning.” As if “the universe” sits around and writes down descriptions in a book, which is irrefutable.

Even if this were true, why do people have to accept those meanings?

Some symbols point to things that actually exist. Other symbols are fabricated with the intent of referring to fictions as if they were real. In both cases, the symbols are cooked and plumped up with meanings to impart a reaction.

I suppose the name Jesus is the most widespread name used on Earth. But instead of standing back and allowing the individual to decide what, if anything, it means to him, priest classes move in and organize religions to tell their stories, to embellish and codify the meaning of that name. And then to fight and kill to defend it.

Now we know Jesus was a fraud at least the name, a made up name for a religious figure. But go to the store and tell people this and some would want to hurt you. Now I know it is a false name, do I go around avoiding people that use it?

Well,  if I did I would not be around many people. This is very childish to act like this and it separates people and cause division.

But its just a name right? Why get so torn up over it? Why separate from your neighbors because they say it?

Here is the symbol-maker’s proposition: “I’ll give you a symbol and tell you what it means and what it refers to. Then I want you to accept it, yes, but also to imbue it with feeling and awe and power. Give that power to the symbol. Make that investment. It’s your duty. Don’t vary or quibble.”

This is how humans are made into ciphers. This is mind control.

Dont let names and symbols rule your life. We would not be human if we had no fear, but fear is a way to stay away from danger and its how the evil one separates us!


The true Ark of Covenant is evil!


Speak to the people of Israel
And let them make me a Sanctuary
that I may dwell in their midst.
According to all that I show you
concerning the pattern of the tabernacle
and of all its furniture, so you shall make it.
The biblical narrative Old Testament, Exodus 25

And Moses said to the people of Israel

See, the Master has called by name
Bez´alel, the son of Uri, son of Hur, of the tribe of Judah
Oho´liab, the son of Ahis´amach, of the tribe of Dan

and has filled them with the
Spirit of God
and with ability, and with intelligence, with knowledge,
and with all craftsmanship, to devise artistic designs,
to work in gold…
in every skilled craft…to do any work in the construction of the sanctuary.
The biblical narrative, Old Testament, Exodus 35 and 36


The Master said to Moses

“The poles shall remain in the rings of the ark
they shall not be taken from it.”

And you shall put into the ark
the testimony which I shall give you.anubpyr3

This is a pyramidion – top of a Pyramid.

The Hieroglyphs above aNUBIS correctly read:
aNEBES VARTI = “The Gates of Heaven”
The Hieroglyphs around aNUBIS correctly read
ARAJINA SHKIp-RiTA = “The Box (Coffin) of Orion”



Ark is a boat

Discovered in the Antechamber
Of the tomb of TUT-ankh-amun

The Master said to Moses
Then you shall make a mercy seat of pure gold;
two cubits and a half shall be its length,
and a cubit and a half its breadth.*
And you shall make two cherubim of gold;
of hammered work shall you make them,
on the two ends of the mercy seat.

Make one cherub on the one end,
and one cherub on the other end;
of one piece with the mercy seat shall you
make the cherubim on its two ends…

And you shall put the mercy seat
on the top of the ark;

and in the ark you shall put
the testimony that I shall give you.

The Table of the Tabernacle

mercyst4 alrge image[An “ark” is a ship, so that the actual original “ark” of the covenant
is the ship under the mercy seat, together with the table beneath it,
originally containing the tablets of Moses and the Ten Commandments.
The “ark” of legend carried into battle is the “table” with Anubis on it
later containing the two ivory tablets of Moses found in King Tut’s tomb.
(They are blank – so they were never redone after initial destruction.)

“And you shall make a table of acacia wood; two cubits
shall be its length, a cubit its breadth, and a cubit and a half
its height. You shall overlay it with pure gold, and make a
molding of gold around it. And you shall make around
it a frame a handbreadth wide, and a molding of gold
around the frame.”

“And you shall make for it four rings of gold,
and fasten the rings to the four corners at its four legs.
Close to the frame the rings shall lie, as holders for the
poles to carry the table.”

“You shall make the poles of acacia wood, and overlay
them with gold. and the table shall be carried with these.
And you shall make its plates aud dishes for incense,
and its flagons and bowls with which to pour libations:
of pure gold you shall make them. And you shall set the
bread of the Presence on the table before me always.”


The “Biblical cubit” reported in making the Ark,
the Tabernacle and its furnishings was only HALF
of the royal Pharaonic cubit of about 21 inches:
so an error in Biblical translation or historical transfer
has occurred, confusing the cubit with the term
for half-a-cubit (a span).

When half-a-cubit is used, most of the measurements fit.
For example, The Mercy Seat is about 65-70 cm, or
26-28 inches long (it depends on whether you measure
above or below). Since the Bible reports the Mercy Seat
to be 2 1/2 “cubits” long this fits to a (half-a-) cubit,
i.e. a span of about 10 – 11 inches. That measures
were confused in Bible translation has been noted by others.

The Consecrated Parts
of Aaron
In the Tabernacle of the Master

consecrated parts of aaron

The Consecrated Parts of Aaron, as told to us by the
Copper Scroll
were kept inside this shrine (above).
They were inside this shrine in 4 Canopic Jars
used to hold the vital organs taken out before mummification.
When the lid is taken off the shrine above, we see as below:

The 4  sons of Aaron

The Consecrated Parts of Aaron
are watched over by the 4 Biblical “Sons of Aaron”
each within the Canopic Jars above as a mini-casket (sarcophag)
each of which looks like this (4 of these were inside the above shrine).


These four Sons of Aaron are:
– in correct order –
Nadab, Abihu, Eleasar and Itamar

who the Egyptologists call, respectively,
Dua-mutef, Hapi, Kebeh-senuef, and Amset

which are mistranscriptions
(Mu-tef = Na-dab, Hapi = Abihu, Kebeh-Senuef = Elea-Sar,
and Amset is reversed, ie. et-Ams = Ita-mar).

For the Lamps of Eternal Light

Found in Tutankhamun lamp of eternal light

Discovered in the Antechamber
Of the tomb of TUT-ankh-amun

The Master said to Moses

“And you shall make a lamp-stand of pure gold.
The base and the shaft of the lampstand
shall be made of hammered work;
its cups. its capitals and its flowers
shall be of one piece with it;
and there shall be six branches going out of its sides,
three branches of the lampstand cut of one side of it
and three branches of the lampstand
out of the other side of it;
three made like almonds, each with capital and flower,
on one branch,
and three cups made like almonds,
each with capital and flower, on the other branch
– so for the six branches
going out of the lampstand;
and on the lampstand itself
four cups made like almonds…”


Count in the Lampstand above

SIX Branches but only FOUR FLOWERS

Count the flowers and stems carefully and compare Exodus.

Surely there is not
in the whole ancient world another Lampstand such as this one
fitting the description in Exodus of the Lampstand of the Tabernacle.

The Biblical mistranslation of “almond” instead of “lily” comes from confusion of
Indo-European (e.g. Latvian, Lithuanian) gile, jile “almond, Mandel” with lilija “lily”.

The Tabernacle
of the Master
The Outer Shrine – Shrine 1


Shrine I of Tutankhamun’s tomb is 2.7 meters high,
including the top above the frames.
The same measuring stick (a span = half-a-cubit)
applies here as to the Mercy Seat.
The dimensions of Shrine I correspond as follows
to the dimensions given in the Bible
for the Tabernacle of the Lord.

If a full cubit were meant in the Bible, the Tabernacle
would be 5.4 meters high.

The ratio of width to length
of Shrine I of the Tabernacle is  1 to 1.5
(i.e. 3.3 meters to 5 meters).

Given the breadth of the frames as 1 “cubit” and a half,
this means that 10 and not 20 frames
made a side, and six frames made the end,
whereas 8 frames made up the doors to the front.

(This can be seen in subsequent pictures of Tut’s Shrine).

The 5 bars across the frames to all sides will also be seen.

The Tabernacle
of the Master
The 1st Inner Shrine – Shrine 2


Inside the outer shrine and draped over the second shrine
was a framework of wood
holding up an enormous dark linen pall (spread),
sewn with thousands of bronze star-rosettes,
the effect of which resembled the night sky.
This is also described in the Bible..
The pall was in fragile condition, the fabric
having been torn from its attachments over the ages
by the weight of the ornaments.

Between the first and second shrines were also found
various ceremonial objects, wrapped in linen.
Among these were two staves,
one each of gold and silver,
with figures of the young king.

The staves suggest figures carried by priests
and officials of state.

The Tabernacle
of the Master
The 2nd Inner Shrine – Shrine 3


This is Shrine III of Tutankhamun’s tomb.
For more information, recommended readings are:

a) Tutanchamun, M.V. Seton-Williams
and Kamal El Mallakh, Krüger Verlag, Frankfurt
b) Tutankhamun: His Tomb and its Treasures
Metropolitan Museum of Art, Alfred Knopf, 1976
d) Tutanchamun, Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 1980
e) Ägypten, Alberto Siliotti, Karl Müller Verlag, Erlangen
f) The Shrines of Tut-Ankh-Amon, Alexandre Piankoff,
Bollingen Series XL.2, Princeton University Press, 1977

used as the basis for these pictures of the shrine.

The Tabernacle
of the Master
The Innermost Shrine – Shrine 4


Shrine IV – the Inner Shrine – of Tutankhamun’s tomb
is dedicated to Per-Nu, the Holy of the North.

The Journey of Resurrection begins at the inner Shrine
“the House of the Flame”.

For more information, recommended readings are:

a) Tutanchamun, M.V. Seton-Williams
and Kamal El Mallakh, Krüger Verlag, Frankfurt
b) Tutankhamun: His Tomb and its Treasures
Metropolitan Museum of Art, Alfred Knopf, 1976
d) Tutanchamun, Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 1980
e) Ägypten, Alberto Siliotti, Karl Müller Verlag, Erlangen
f) The Shrines of Tut-Ankh-Amon, Alexandre Piankoff,
Bollingen Series XL.2, Princeton University Press, 1977

used as the basis for these pictures of the shrine.

This info and lots more is on this site.


Is the Sycamore/fig tree the “Tree of Life”?


Sycamore is a common name that is applied used at various times and places to three very different taxa of trees, Ficus sycomorus, Acer pseudoplatanus, and all members of the genus Platanus. These trees are located in three different orders of flowering plants.

Ficus sycomorus is the sycamore (or sycomore) of the Bible. It is a species of fig native to the Middle East and eastern Africa. It is also known as the sycamore fig or fig-mulberry.

Acer pseudoplatanus is known as sycamore in Britain and Ireland. It is a species of European maple that is called “sycamore maple” in North America, or “plane” in Scotland.

Platanus is a genus of trees of North America known as sycamores. They are known as planes in Europe. There are several species, including the American sycamore and the California sycamore. The term sycamore particularly is used for Platanus occidentalis, the American sycamore.

These trees offers unique ecological, aesthetic, and commercial values. Ficus sycomorus, which was popularly cultivated by the ancient Egyptians, requires a tiny wasp in order to reproduce sexually, as opposed to grafting. The sycamore is a giant tree, standing as much as 6 meters (20 feet) wide; the wasp is a tiny insect. Yet, reflecting the harmony in nature, both depend on each other (mutualism), as the wasp needs Ficus sycomorus for a place to lay its eggs and the tree depends on the wasp to pollinate its flowers.

Acer pseudoplatanus is noted for its tolerance of urban pollution, salt spray, and wind, making it a popular ornamental tree for planting in cities, along salt-treated roads, and in coastal localities. It also provides wood for furniture, flooring, and other uses. Members of the Platanus genus are among the more common trees planted in North American and Europe for shade, and are commonly found in public parks or city streets. This is also reflected in the common name of sycamore for street names in the United States.


640px-Sycomore fig tree

This is a Fig Sycamore.

MayaIzapaTree izpa stele

Izapa Stele from Izapa, Mexico

This is the tree of life for many cultures. This I believe represents the Sycamore Fig tree of Chiapas, Mexico. Egyptians used this and the Cedar tree a lot in Hieroglyphs and Stele’s . The Mormon group have their views as do the Christians on what the tree of life represents. Whether we want to attach this in our spiritual realm individually or not is up to each his own. But I feel knowing were Egypt really is and Midian was where Moses fled to, gives one a head start. The land of Midian appears to be what some Mormons call the land of bountiful. Peten, Mexico is actually where the Egyptian Sinhue went to, he is also suspected of being Moses. I do know that Sinhue means “son of the Sycamores” I also know most of the sarcophagus used by the Keta’s or Egyptians was made from a type of sycamore tree. Its wood was used for many things as well as its fruit and sap.


The Story of Sinuhe” is considered one of the finest works of Ancient Egyptian literature. It is a narrative set in the aftermath of the death of Pharaoh Amenemhat I, founder of the 12th dynasty of Egypt, in the early 20th century BC. It is likely that it was composed only shortly after this date, albeit the earliest extant manuscript is from the reign of Amenemhat III, c. 1800 BC.[1] There is an ongoing debate among Egyptologists as to whether or not the tale is based on actual events involving an individual named Sinuhe,[2] with the consensus being that it is most likely a work of fiction.[3][4] Due to the universal nature of the themes explored in “Sinuhe”, including divine providence and mercy, its anonymous author has been described as the “Egyptian Shakespeare” whose ideas have parallels in biblical texts. “Sinuhe” is considered to be a work written in verse and it may also have been performed.[5] The great popularity of the work is witnessed by the numerous surviving fragments.[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Story_of_Sinuhe


Sinuhe’s biography tells the story. It is so close to the biblical story of the Exodus its leaves one with know doubts. But I feel this way and you may feel different. Investigate and search it out. You will find many other truths in this journey. I again encourage you to study the history and put the puzzle together as my family has.

Ill leave you with this. I have found evidence that the mummies in the Left hand east where in the Yucatan and South America at one time. Do to desecration of the tombs the Egyptians moved them across the Atlantic. Ever wondered why they find tombs with many sarcophagus’s just leaned up in a corner over their? Hmmmm?? They worshiped these people that would not of happened ..Unless??

Dont trust my word here look into yourself and trust no man!

Where is Delphi? Who was Agamemnon? Where was he buried?

Wow! What a crazy ride this is? When one looks hard enough he/she can uncover amazing truths.

We are going to switch gears here for a moment and touch a subject not biblical but more of a change of history and a lets say “body double” or “tomb double”.

As we search out the “truth” one will come to a cross road. Which way do i go? Both roads look the same. How do I know which one is the real one? Well, for me its just the opposite of what history says.

Do I go East or West?

Do I go East or West?

History map says go East but Ill go West this time.

History map says go East but Ill go West this time.


In Greek mythology, Agamemnon (/æɡəˈmɛmnɒn/; Greek: Ἀγαμέμνων from *Ἀγαμέδμων (from ἄγαν, “very much” and μέδομαι, “think on”),[1] “very steadfast”) was the son of king Atreus and queen Aerope of Mycenae, the brother of Menelaus, the husband of Clytemnestra and the father of Iphigenia, Electra or Laodike (Λαοδίκη), Orestes and Chrysothemis.[2] Mythical legends make him the king of Mycenae or Argos, thought to be different names for the same area. When Helen, the wife of Menelaus, ran off with Paris of Troy, Agamemnon commanded the united Greek armed forces in the ensuing Trojan War.

Agamemnon’s family history had been tarnished by rape, murder, incest, and treachery, consequences of the heinous crime perpetrated by his ancestor, Tantalus, and then of a curse placed upon Pelops, son of Tantalus, by Myrtilus, whom he had murdered. Thus misfortune hounded successive generations of the House of Atreus, until atoned by Orestes in a court of justice held jointly by humans and gods.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agamemnon).

This story can lead one on many rabbit trails but i want to share with you a little piece of history that you and I have been lied to about.

Notice this Picture or painted Mural. Do you know who these people are and where this painting is?

agamemnon is holding the staff with the beard under his left arm i a small stick

Before we get into this are you familiar with “Zulu” attire from West Africa?

traditionalzuluclothing zullu chief zullu clothing

In the painting, it is very easy to see the “Zulu” hierarchy clothing on three of the men with their extravagant head dresses as do the men in the pictures above from west Africa.

Your imagination can go many directions but my spirit says this clothing or dress in painting originated in West Africa and these people are of African descent. This seems easy enough but wait the painting is not in Africa its in, Yep, you guessed it the two lands (Yucatan).

At a location deep in the jungles at a ruin today, but was a thriving city in its day. Lets see where this painting is!


City of Delphi!


Notice the rooms atop the first photo. This is where the paintings are. Lets look at some!

bonampak room 1 Room-2

BonampakMural4 with Davids Mother

agamemnon is holding the staff with the beard under his left arm i a small stick

Agamemnon is holding the staff with the beard under his left arm with a small stick, the man across from him is his bio Father Achilles pointing back at him. Several years ago a man named “Horace Butler” disclosed this info to National Geographic. Horace says “I knew what they would do when i told them who’s tomb this is, they will go dig him up just as they have all the kings” and they did just what he said they would do.

Here is a photo of Agamemnon’s body in his tomb.


But they did not release the truth just more lies. So we have to do our own investigation and the results as usual, different than history says it is. This man was an evil person. Committing atrocities so bad when he came here to Delphi (Today Bonampak Mexico) They killed him and buried him here. But wait the history says he is buried elsewhere. Look at this history lie.

fake burial

This is suppose to be Agamemnon’s tomb in Ancient Greece but Greece is not where they say it is and the Greek Agamemnon is not buried here. Also he is dark skinned. So does this mean Greeks were black? Yes, it does!

The true Egyptians and Greeks are black not white. Now this may come as a shock for most but its not a shock to me. You see people make it a race thing and Im white. But I search for truth and as I always say ‘It is what it is”. Our Father created us all and we all have the same promise. But what im finding out are the Egyptians and Greeks were mostly evil people doing evil things and worshiping a mans spirit “AMEN” The evidence is overwhelming and the public needs to know.

With this new info I hope you will search out this matter. This is not the only tomb double, as the left hand has many of them.

All in the East is what I call a slight of a left hand. Nothing over there matches the biblical narrative and the Catholic church came over to this land the 2 lands and robbed our histories and artifacts to concoct a a double story. Its no secret these archeologists are led by a principality and take artifacts or steal them then ship them overseas to create this allusion.

Wake up folks its time to search out the old paths because the rocks cry out, dont they?

Ill leave you with this, the women holding the baby is David’s (Thutomosis III) mother. Plus many of the people in painting are biblical people you know but we will cover that later in another blog.


The Millo or “Citadel” of David (Twthomosis III)

The Construction of Sacsayhuamán

The immense fortress was put together with the usage of huge stone blocks. Nobody knows exactly who had built Sacsayhuamán, when and most importantly, how?


  Machu Pichu can be admired for its great location and splendid views, rather than its construction.

Sacsayhuamán can be admired mostly for the remarkable architectural engineering skills that were needed for its creation.

 The Incas told the Spaniards that they weren’t the ones who built Sacsayhuamán, but “the giants”. In their mythology there were huge people living in the Cuzco area and they carried the huge stone blocks and put them together.

The city of Cuzco was built in the shape of a puma, a holy animal in the Inca beliefs. The head of the puma was actually Sacsayhuamán.

Sacsayhuamán was a massive fortress of the Incas capable of accommodating 5,000 fighters.

Today the complex is in ruins, but we know from chronicles and the words-of-mouth from local Quechuans that it was bigger, higher and it even had towers.

During a siege, the fortress had suffered tremendously due to Spanish attack, led by Francisco Pizarro.

It is believed that the upper parts of the fort contained smaller stones, which were easily demolished and taller moved away and used for the construction of colonial buildings.

The large stones were too heavy and the Spaniards simply left them in their original shape…

Specialists affirm that originally, the walls of the fort were approximately 3 m (9.84 ft) higher than today.

Shockingly, any traveler can notice that some stone blocks used in constructing the complex are gigantic, the size of small trucks even!

Nobody knows how these huge stones were cut and moved into place.

Many stones weigh over 50 tons and the biggest one has over 120 tons. For comparison, a US Army Abrams Tank weights just over 50 tons. Imagine lifting a tank… Even with modern cranes, it would be a very difficult task! Now, imagine lifting twice that weight (about 120 tons) in the middle ages, when it is believed that the fortress was constructed… Hard to imagine how the Incas would have done this…

We can also add the fact that the Incas did not know the wheel, they did not write either.

The cutting of the hard rocks is another mystery that so far no-one has given any plausible answer to.

With understanding the construction of Sacsayhuamán we are no further than with understanding the construction of the Egyptian Pyramids!

Famous Quechuan-Spanish chronicle writer, Garcilaso de la Vega once wrote about Sacsayhuamán:

This fortress surpasses the constructions known as the seven wonders of the world. For in the case of a long broad wall like that of Babylon, or the colossus of Rhodes, or the pyramids of Egypt, or the other monuments, one can see clearly how they were executed. They did it by summoning an immense body of workers and accumulating more and more material day by day and year by year. They overcame all difficulties by employing human effort over a long period. But it is indeed beyond the power of imagination to understand now these Indians, unacquainted with devices, engines, and implements, could have cut, dressed, raised, and lowered great rocks, more like lumps of hills than building stones, and set them so exactly in their places. For this reason, and because the Indians were so familiar with demons, the work is attributed to enchantment.

Some Spanish priests and chronicle-writers, among whom Cieza de León, Garcilaso de la Vega, Bernabe Cobo, Sarmiento de Gamboa, Pedro Pizarro have fantasized about Sacsayhuamán having been built by demons, evil spirits…

Most people today, consider the fortress an Inca construction. Though, they themselves told the Spaniards that Sacsayhuamán was built by “giants”.

Indeed, many of us doubt the fact that the Incas could have constructed Sacsayhuamán.

A simple analysis of the construction style and material will lead us to the conclusion that indeed, Sacsayhuamán resembles other Inca constructions, but in many ways it differs. The immense blocks are just as large as some used in the building of Ollantaytambo.

The specialists who doubt that Sacsayhuamán was built by Incas, believe that the lower, larger rocks were placed there by some other culture, some have even pointed out to the Chachapoyas culture, those who built Kuelap.

 Estimates tell us that approximately 20.000 to 30.000 people were needed for the construction of Sacsayhuamán. The works would have went on for about 60 years.

The probable end date of the construction works was in 1508. This means, it was finished just a few years before the arrival of the Spaniards led by Pizarro (which happened in 1526).

90B-Image Satellite View Temple Site

2Sa_5:6 And the king and his men went to Jerusalem unto the Jebusites, the inhabitants of the land: which spake unto David, saying, Except thou take away the blind and the lame, thou shalt not come in hither: thinking, David cannot come in hither.
2Sa_5:8 And David said on that day, Whosoever getteth up to the gutter, and smiteth the Jebusites, and the lame and the blind, that are hated of David’s soul, he shall be chief and captain. Wherefore they said, The blind and the lame shall not come into the house. (The scriptures 1998)

1. [An. 1088.] Now the Jebusites, who were the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and were by extraction Canaanites, shut their gates; and placed the blind and the lame and all their maimed persons upon the wall; in way of derision of the King: and said, that “The very lame themselves would hinder his entrance into it.” This they did out of contempt of his power; and as depending on the strength of their walls. David was hereby enraged; and began the siege of Jerusalem, and employed his utmost diligence and alacrity therein; as intending by the taking of this place to demonstrate his power; and to intimidate all others that might be of the like [evil] disposition towards him. So he took the lower city by force; but the citadel held out still.

 (Antiquities of the Jews — Book VII chapter 3) http://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/ant-7.html


David (Twthomosis III) called it the “Citadel”

He came in and took over the city Heru-solyma (Jerusalem) a city of Sun worshipers. Today the name Sacsayhu-AMAN holds the ancient name of Aman,Atum, Amen or Adam…

Some copies of Josephus have here Solyma or Salem; and others Hierosolyma or Jerusalem. The latter best agree to what Josephus says elsewhere, Of the War VI.10. that this city was called Solyma or Salem before the days of Melchisedeck; but was by him called Hierosolyma or Jerusalem.

This fortress was originally built by “Giants” by the evidence of stones weighing in access of 100 tons in some locations. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure this one out. Unless one wants to keep following the Left hand histories. David was not a good guy as we have been led to believe. He worshiped ‘Amen” plain and simple. Evidence is all over the place in Cuzco, Peru. Nowhere in the world is a fortress built to this caliber with Sun, animals, and Jupiter worship everywhere littering the landscape. We have to understand that this location was built upon many times by people that worshiped the flesh or past loved ones. Take a look at this picture. Do you know where it is?

Baalbeck google image

Baal-beck, Lebanon. This complex built with mans hands had the Temple of Jupiter and Venus within its walls. Notice the Octagon shape.

Layoutof temple in Baalbek

Notice the picture and the same layout.

Temple locations

Muslim Mosque, Jerusalem Israel

Sacsayhu- “AMEN” is very similar.

sun_temple90A-Image Foundation Stones

Often it is mentioned as Muyuqmarka or Muyuq Marka (in Quechuan language), but sometimes it is written as Muyucmarka and even Moyoc Marca.

This is one of 3 ruins consisting of 3 concentric circular wall ruins.

This used to be a tower and it is located inside Sacsayhuamán. Though, Muyucmarca is the name of the place, not the tower.

3 water channels were constructed, which were probably used for filling a reservoir in the center of the sites.

Otherwise, not much is known about Muyucmarca…

The exact purpose of it is still not known and might never be determined.

Chronicle writer Garcilaso de la Vega wrote that there were 3 towers at Muyucmarca, at the top of the walls. These towers were built at equal distance from each other, forming a triangle. The main tower was erected in the center and it was a cylindrical-shaped one. This tower was called Muyuc Marca or Muyucmarca, the other 2 towers were Paucar Marca and Sallac Marca (or Sallaqmarca, sometimes Sallaq Marka). The latter 2 both had rectangular-shaped bases.

It is not known why the main tower was round and the other 2 rectangular.

Round towers are less stable, for sure and they allow lower altitudes than rectangular ones. If someone wants to build a solid, high tower, then it is most likely to be rectangular. Let’s think about skyscrapers: how many of them are round? Very few, indeed.

David was not a pyramid builder but built temple sites for his worship of “AMEN”

Machu Pichu was the throne for “Amen” and was purchased by David for Solomon (Amenhotep III) knowing this. Solomon built a temple there for the Pharaohs daughter and this is what we see today. Solomon or his real name Amenhotep III  was married to Tiye the pharo’s daughter (Joseph was Tiye’s birth Father and his real name was YUYA) but married his stepsister first who was only 3 at the time. Sick Huh! The eldest daughter holds the seat to the throne in Egyptian hierarchy. So Amenhotep III married “Sitamun” first to lock up his seat as King. Amenhotep III had over 700 wives just as it was written of King Solomon. To many similarities to not be correct. But be your own judge.

Sacsayhuaman was Davids Citadel or “Millo” David built on top of what was already a sun worshiping Temple location. It is also written that David is buried here along with Solomon near a pool and the North wall of Heru-Solym. I have suspicions that this is “Heliopolis” as well. Egyptian scarabs say Amenhotep III was ruler of Heliopolis.

This opens up many discussions on this biblical and history lie we have been spoon fed all our lives. Can you say coming out of Babylon? This info is another step out of it and I encourage you that read this, to prove all things and trust no man and let your spirit of common sense guide you. Because Yahu our one and only Father gave us this at birth. So use it and stop listening to these false lies and step back and take a deep breathe because this ride will be bumpy.

Let me share a new location with you that Im trying to cipher what biblical city it is?


Choquequirao in South America near Machu Pichu.

Choquequirao in South America near Machu Pichu.

“The bird layouts of Machupichu”

As we venture even deeper into this subject, one can easily see how “Christianity” has stolen the histories of the Egyptians / Ibri and created the same stage and actors but with different names.  We know Horus is depicted in the New Testament story as Jesus. Of coarse the Catholic church being the leader of such a change carries the Egyptian idolatry just as the Egyptians / Ibri did and still do. We will cover that later on in another blog.

The different bird layouts just on Machupichu in Peru give us more evidence of the Egyptian presence and influence. It appears they worshiped birds and animals by the statutes and hieroglyphs that litter the 2nd egypt in the East.

Eye of Horus 2

Eye of Horus

Machupichu is in the eye of what appears to be a hawk or falcon. I tried to find a Horus hawk drawing to do a comparison. But you get the idea.


I will use the Egyptian names with the christian names to show how they have tricked us all and stole their histories and myths to make them our life. We have all done this so be your own judge.

Horus (HOR us) / Heru and Jesus

God of the sky, depicted as a falcon, or as a hawk/falcon-headed man.

Since Horus was said to be the sky god, he was considered to also contain the sun and moon. It became said that the sun was his right eye and the moon his left, and that they traversed the sky when he, a falcon, flew across it. Thus he became known as Harmerty – Horus of two eyes.

Myth of Osiris, Isis and Horus:
Osiris/Able was a king who taught the Egyptians how to live, worship and grow corn. He was murdered by his jealous brother, Khonsu/Cain who cut up the body, scattering it over Egypt. Osiris’s beloved wife, Isis/Mary and her sister collected all the pieces. Isis used her medical skills first to impregnate herself with the last drop of semen in her consort’s penis, and then to reassemble the corpse as the first mummy and bring it back to life. The first magic worked, and she became pregnant with Horus But the gods refused to let Osiris return to the world of mortals, and he went to rule in the Underworld, the lord and judge of the dead.

Myth of Horus and Seth:
Horus/Heru w
ould avenge his father at Edfu and Horus became known as the Egyptian god of the sky. In that Horus was the son of Osiris, he became closely associated with the Pharaoh of Lower Egypt (where Horus was worshiped), and became their patron. Seth was the patron of Upper Egypt. Horus united Egypt and bestowed divinity upon the pharaohs who were viewed as incarnations of Horus in life. On the other hand, , once the two lands were united, Seth and Horus were often shown together crowning the new pharaohs, as a symbol of their power over both Lower and Upper Egypt.

Later Egyptians interpreted the myth of the conflict between Set and Osiris/Horus as an analogy for the struggle between the desert (represented by Seth) and the fertilizing floods of the Nile (Osiris/Horus).

The Eyes of Horus:
Horus fought with Seth (his uncle) for the throne of Egypt. In this battle one of his eyes was injured and later it was healed by Isis (his mother). His right eye represented the sun; his left eye the moon.

Forms of Horus:
Mythologically, the god was imagined as a celestial falcon, whose right eye was the sun and left eye the moon. The speckled feathers of his breast were probably considered to be the stars, while his wings were the sky that created the wind.

The most familiar form of Horus is as a full falcon, probably the lanner (Falco biarmicus) or peregrine (Falco peregrinus).

It is as a falcon-headed man that the god most frequently appears, often wearing one the following crowns:

Double Crown (Pschent) signifying his kingship over all Egypt.
Atef (White crown with a plume on either side and a small disc at the top),
Triple atef
Disk with two plumes

Horus is also depicted with wings in a solar disk flanked by 2 cobras and vulture with outspread wings.


Machupichu has yet another bird that was used and is hidden in the layout of the complex.


“We have been waiting five hundred years. The Inca prophecies say that now, in this age, when the eagle of the North and the condor of the South fly together, the Earth will awaken. The eagles of the North cannot be free without the condors of the South. Now it’s happening. Now is the time. The Aquarian Age is an era of light, an age of awakening, an age of returning to natural ways. Our generation is here to help begin this age, to prepare through different schools to understand the message of the heart, intuition, and nature. Native people speak with the Earth. When consciousness awakens, we can fly high like the eagle, or like the condor.”– Willaru  (http://www.labyrinthina.com/mayan.htm)



The Sacred Bird

Men and nature worked perfectly together to create this architectonic genius complex as a harmonic whole. Today we understand that Machu Pichu is one of the most beautiful creations of humankind. The complex rests in the womb of two mountains and is surrounded on both sides by an impressive abyss. The Vilcanota River meanders around the city as a snake. The subtropical rainforest with its forever mist and its picturesque waterfalls do honor the whole.

This Vilanota River is the river the Ark of the covenant (which is a boat) was carried up to Machu Pichu out of Heru-Salem which is Cuzco/Kushco today. (ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphs)



We all can come to the same conclusion when we know that the Ark of the Covenant is not as the biblical narrative describes but is just “Plagiarism” the theft of someone elses ideas and publications.

When the conquistadors came they were instructed to not leave a trace of their (Egyptians/Hebrews) histories. They knew where Jerusalem was and Memphis (Tenochtitlan) because they had been there before. It was no secret because every tribe was already here but the ones who left, their ancestors came back at different times across the Atlantic. The Catholic church lead this and is also to blame for the plagiarism. We can see it all through out their satanic left hand ceremonies. Im not saying all Catholics are bad but one has to have blinders on not to see whats going on.  They no whats going on!

Machupichu was the actual place of Amen,Atum/Adam’s throne. This is why the Ark was taken their. This is also the location King David purchased for King Solomon who is actually “Amenhotep III.



1 Live Horus, mighty bull appearing in Truth, 2 (he of the) two ladies; he establishes laws, he pacifies the Two Lands; 3 Gold Horus, great of strength, who smites the Asiatics; the king of Upper and Lower Egypt, lord of the Two Lands, 4 Nebmaatre, son of Re, Amenhotep (III), ruler of Thebes, given life, 5 (and) the great king’s wife, Tiy, may she live, the name of her father is 6 Yuya, the name of her mother is Tjuia. 7 She is the wife of a mighty king 8 whose southern boundary is as far as Karoy 9 (and) the northern as far as Naharin.  (http://www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/texts/amenhotep_iii.htm)

Amenhotep III / Solomon ruled Thebes. Well were is Thebes? Thebes is the capital of Lower Egypt, Heru-Salem / Cuzco, Peru. Memphis (Tenochtitlan) was capital of upper Egypt.

Something interesting I have found out is that in Cuzco there is an impression in the earth on a mount that resembles the temple mentioned he built. There is also a similar one at Baalbek and i will cover this one in next blog.

Here is a hint:  They want us to believe the Solomons temple in scripture was in the East but actually there were three, one at Cuzco, one at Baalbek, Lebanon, one in the east Jerusalem on what they call the Mt. Zion. Will the real temple please stand up?

This is a lot of meat, so chew well. But remember, all this info is staring all of us right in the face. Dont believe me but study brothers and sisters, do the research so you will not be deceived anymore. Teach yourself and stay away from man’s teachings, use common sense which is really our spirit guiding us. Thanks for reading, the next blog will be exciting to write.